Thank you all for your amazing ideas in the comments on my first reflection.
There are some more ideas I would like to share with you about my project.

I am not sure how to evaluate this phenomenon, since it leads the discussion back to the purpose of the blog. If the goal is to let students think about their daily life and reflect on their learning experience, then "I" should be invited in their posts and their writing should be part of their identity. However, if the blog is expected to be a space where students ponder about general questions and practice academic writing, then the objectivity should be appreciated. When having these two situations, I cannot help asking myself who has the right to decide the purpose of the blog. If the instructor has the power, will it still be "learner-centered" education? If the students does, are they mature enough at this point to make the best decision for themselves? Or, as raised by Joyce, should the college also teach students to deal with tasks they have to do although they may not like it? I just keep posing questions, but cannot find the perfect solutions to them.

Also, when responding to others, students tend to be sweet smiling faces instead of challenging questioners, especially, as Student R mentioned, after two students had a conflict about the way of challenging others' ideas. Responding in writing language is the primary way for students to comment on each other's posts. They are expected to be thoughtful and respectful in their comments. Here comes the questions about the differences between personal and public speech, as well as writing and oral language. As instructors, we did start the conversations and prepare students well for the task until the conflicts happened. Due to the lack of relavant skills, students get worried about their social relationships and decide to shut their changeling ideas down. Therefore, when do it next time, we may think about what we need to do to prepare student better for the tasks they are assigned with. Also, student may get irritated when reading others comments because they misunderstand their tone or intention. Accordingly, it may be helpful to spare some class time to discuss about what is going on in the blog. By having face-to-face communication, students may understand each other better, and become genuin curious about others' ideas.
Honestly, I didn't expect to find such a rich body of information and to learn so much. At this point, I am really glad to that I did this, which gives me many ideas about what to do when I have my own class. Also, thank you, my dear professor and classmate, for your constant encouragement :)
Annie, as always, your reflections are insightful and take your findings to another level of usefulness. I think all themes are valid, in that your qualitative data are compelling and a reader could easily see how you raise these concerns about identity and belonging and social pressure. in other words, qualitative research does not "prove or disprove" these phenomena, but cause us to be "disturbed" and to go beyond our common sense. It seems to me that you have touched on enormously important dynamics that, even if they do not hold true for every student, should most definitely be looked into by the FI faculty.Your point about lacking skills especially rings true to me, as I have seen mothers in prison NOT write to their children (whom they love very much) because they were embarrassed about their spelling.
ReplyDelete