This past week I had the experience of participating in a
large scale brainstorming project during my off-site meeting in Philadelphia.
Over 220 people were divided into teams, intentionally putting people together
that have not even met before. We were then given a problem and told to come up
with a solution, all in the framework of a (friendly) competition. But what
followed was the most intense experience of team storming I have ever observed.
Soon, four divisions fractured our table group, so subsets of the table shared
some of the same beliefs and values, but it felt like a moving target trying to reach consensus. It was difficult to work together since we had
skipped any number of steps in trying to build a team and went straight into
trying to solve the problem without any ground rules. (How my table
participants would benefit from our Groups and Teams class!) After three hours
of painful discussion, we reached the outline of an idea. With only an hour in
the morning to prepare our presentation, we were surely facing public failure.
Somehow, some sleep and coffee in the morning provided two of us some clarity. (We wrote a skit that mirrored Match.com as our customers looked for the right
match – a bank that would love them.) In an hour we created a script for the skit,
drew props and did a run-through for each couple. Our only hope was that we
would not embarrass ourselves in front of our senior executives. To our TOTAL
surprise, we were named as semi-finalists. To receive this social validation
from the executives was more than we expected. Next, we presented in front of
the entire room, trying to quickly change our shared basic assumption that our
solution and skit weren’t good enough. Needless to say, we didn’t win, but all
I could do was ponder the wasted opportunity.
The participants at my table did not share the same beliefs
about our bank culture and therefore were unable to reach consensus or effectively
generate new ideas. We even lacked common language to communicate normally with each other. As Schein explains it, “When a group is first created or when it faces a new task,
issue or problem, the first solution proposed to deal with it reflects some
individual’s own assumptions about what is right or wrong, what will work or
not work” (Schein, p. 25). Not every table experienced the same struggles that
we did, but I know that many did. We
spent approximately 1100 hours of collective time on that activity. If they had only set up
the exercise differently, created an environment of creativity but created boundaries and a framework, incredible ideas could have been born. Connections could have been created. Teams could have been formed.
As another commentary on our culture, in his opening
remarks, our HR senior executive said “leaving Card and coming to Bank was like
going to another country…” A great culture is not easy to replicate, even
within the same organization. Different lines of business have very different ways
of treating their associates, communicating with them, and getting things done.
As Schein points out, changing a culture
creates a lot of anxiety and in some cases distortion and denial in order to minimize
the stress of our reality. My hope is that our new HR executive will be able to
bring over artifacts of greatness from the Card side before the Bank’s norms and rules
become all he can see.
VERY interesting reflection, Jen. It reminds us how powerful these invisible forces are (and, as Schein observes, how culture change unsettles our sense of belonging, right and wrong, and our very identity). Now--as I read it, this enormous culture divide you experienced was essentially the painful dissonance between different work cultures. Not to minimize this AT ALL, but now, let's start adding in language, ethnicity, age... Relating Schein's to Freire: thinking about the courage of those women in Elsasser's class: tampering with, even introducing deep cultural fractures in the Bahamian society across gender lines... Whew.
ReplyDeleteAn illuminating post, Jen. Thank you!
So did you have enough time to storm, norm, form, and perform? Is that even the right order? Action learning would dictate that you might have tried to use only questions or statements in response to questions as a ground rule to bring the group together faster (have you taken capstone?). But in reality, I think you did pretty darn well getting a group of strangers together from different cultures in a high stakes competition for the bosses. Glad I'm not in the corporate world :)
ReplyDelete